Hey, Dan...

it'd be really nice if you would fucking unblock me already .__.

wot hoppon

i'm betting ten bucks that nick spammed 'THE GAME' on aim

those lame ass socks wrote:

i'm betting ten bucks that nick spammed 'THE GAME' on aim

this may be a possibility, seeing he has an obsession with an overused and annoying meme



also: that rhymed

Ghost of Christmas Past wrote:

those lame ass socks wrote:

i'm betting ten bucks that nick spammed 'THE GAME' on aim

this may be a possibility, seeing he has an obsession with an overused and annoying meme

This.

....no.

Ish not it.

It has nothing to do with the game.

He has an inability to have a friendly argument.

something tells me this was unworthy of blocking over

No, it's not. If it's what I think it is then his blocking was reasonable.

Mr. Hanky wrote:

No, it's not. If it's what I think it is then his blocking was reasonable.

I AM SO CONFUSED ;_;

Point A: It was worthy of blocking over.
Point B: HL didn't need to get involved.
Point C: I haven't unblocked you because I haven't been on AIM in days.

Holy Cock wrote:

Point A: It was worthy of blocking over.
Point B: HL didn't need to get involved.
Point C: I haven't unblocked you because I haven't been on AIM in days.

A) No, it really wasn't.
B) I had no other means of contacting you.
C) This is valid.

POINT Q: we can get involved if we want to so stop being an ass and tell us what happened.

Also: Considering we all keep in touch both on and outside of HL, things that happen outside can effect those inside.

Well, that and, its already on HL and there's no avoiding it.
:x

tripleposting newfag

Chocolate Santa wrote:

tripleposting newfag

Getting my post count up the easy way.

Nickosaurus wrote:

Holy Cock wrote:

Point A: It was worthy of blocking over.
Point B: HL didn't need to get involved.
Point C: I haven't unblocked you because I haven't been on AIM in days.

A) No, it really wasn't.
B) I had no other means of contacting you.
C) This is valid.

...I actually agree with Dan on this one.
:x

The Grinch wrote:

Nickosaurus wrote:

Holy Cock wrote:

Point A: It was worthy of blocking over.
Point B: HL didn't need to get involved.
Point C: I haven't unblocked you because I haven't been on AIM in days.

A) No, it really wasn't.
B) I had no other means of contacting you.
C) This is valid.

...I actually agree with Dan on this one.
:x

Something tells me most people will.

The Grinch wrote:

Nickosaurus wrote:

Holy Cock wrote:

Point A: It was worthy of blocking over.
Point B: HL didn't need to get involved.
Point C: I haven't unblocked you because I haven't been on AIM in days.

A) No, it really wasn't.
B) I had no other means of contacting you.
C) This is valid.

...I actually agree with Dan on this one.
:x

with which part?

i agree that HL didn't have to get involved, but it was most certainly not worth being blocked over. a simple "I advise against this, my opinion won't change, and i am not comfortable talking about it" would have sufficed.

YOU DRAGGED US INTO THIS.
WHY NOT TELL US WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED?

It's none of everybody's business. No one's really dragged into this at all, because no-one knows anything.

Nickosaurus wrote:

It's none of everybody's business. No one's really dragged into this at all, because no-one knows anything.

Incorrect. We know that there was some sort of conflict that may or may not have supported blocking (I hope that made sense). Secondly, you brought a smidge of that conflict to HL. Seeing as we as a whole are HL, we may attempt to get involved as we choose. Whether or not you decide to seek the opinions of us is another story, but the more opinions you have on a subject the easier it may come to an end. After all, majority rules.

Dear Prudence wrote:

Nickosaurus wrote:

It's none of everybody's business. No one's really dragged into this at all, because no-one knows anything.

Incorrect. We know that there was some sort of conflict that may or may not have supported blocking (I hope that made sense). Secondly, you brought a smidge of that conflict to HL. Seeing as we as a whole are HL, we may attempt to get involved as we choose. Whether or not you decide to seek the opinions of us is another story, but the more opinions you have on a subject the easier it may come to an end. After all, majority rules.

It's already been resolved at this point, i will no longer talk to dan about the subject at hand.

And although you are right, i'm not really comfortable talking about it, as it is kind of personal.

Nickosaurus wrote:

Dear Prudence wrote:

Nickosaurus wrote:

It's none of everybody's business. No one's really dragged into this at all, because no-one knows anything.

Incorrect. We know that there was some sort of conflict that may or may not have supported blocking (I hope that made sense). Secondly, you brought a smidge of that conflict to HL. Seeing as we as a whole are HL, we may attempt to get involved as we choose. Whether or not you decide to seek the opinions of us is another story, but the more opinions you have on a subject the easier it may come to an end. After all, majority rules.

It's already been resolved at this point, i will no longer talk to dan about the subject at hand.

And although you are right, i'm not really comfortable talking about it, as it is kind of personal.

That's all you really needed to say to begin with.
xD